I can't quite gel with 'Eat The Rich', though, largely because I am on a diet, and the 'Rich' may well be too fattening. The definition of who is 'Rich' is also important here, since my current pulchitrude would be too appealing if I were to be lumped in with the 'Rich'. Thankfully, a mortgage and college tuition for two will make it quite unlikely I will be mistaken for a 'Ritchie' anytime before I die.
Generally, though, I am behind the movement. And I do mean 'behind'. My generation had enough of getting clubbed and water-hosed back in the 60's and 70's. I'll hang back and defend the rear guard. I accept your thanks with great humility. You are welcome.
My favorite role in this movement would be as the 'counselor' or 'Grand Vizier' (if that's not too Islamic for political correctness). I believe I could give good advice. My first guidance would be to occupy someplace nice. For instance, why occupy downtown LA? Why not Santa Monica? It's still part of Greater LA and Santa Monica boasts the best facilities for the homeless in America - plus there's the beach for getting clean. And don't forget the stunning view.
My second bit of imparted wisdom would be to combine the protest with some practical and helpful action, like street repair. Why not fill up some potholes which marching around? Leave the place you are occupying better than you found it. Spread a little grass seed around the park while you are pounding up the soil with your protesting feet. Paint over some graffiti (faster than you create it).
Of course, the ultimate and overall goal of this movement is, as near as I can gather, to get government in this country to shift a reasonable portion of its attention from the richest of Americans to the rest of us. To get Congress to think about us, the people they have been elected to represent, at least as much as they think about the corporations who fund their campaigns and who bribe (pardon, 'lobby') them with junkets and trinkets and jobs (oh my!)
I wish the movement all success in getting this message through. At the moment, though, it seems the active 'occupiers' aren't too focused in their demands, and it will remain to be seen whether anything realistic and meaningful comes of the movement. Even if it doesn't, those in power in this government, and their corporate backers, would be remiss in dismissing this movement. As I alluded in an earlier blog post, 'occupy' may be the surface bubbling of a vaster underground volcano. Better to do something progressive to release that pressure now, than bottle it up and risk a major blow-out later.
1 comment:
Brilliant, really.
Fix things while occupying them.
Maybe occupy a decrepit bridge until it gets fixed? Attack it with hand tools in some kind of street-theatre pathos-inspiring attempt to DO SOMETHING DAMMIT!!!
My plan is to occupy Christmas, on the supposition that Black Friday and the following Positive Cash-Flow December are the big touchdown-win for the corporations in this nation...
So, if the We of America, the 99ers don't partake in the ritual exchange of gifts we can starve the economic engines of the 1%. No gift sales, no gasoline burned, no restaurant meals eaten, no movies houses attended.... Not a boycott, keep buying the everyday stuff. No General Strike, gotta pay the tuition and mortgage. Just put your hands in your pockets.... No sale.
Need to, must have to, exchange a gift ? Give each other the agreed upon amount of cash. "Hey Here's your 50 bucks... Merry Christmas. Thanks! Here's your 50 bucks... Happy Holidays! * Smirk*
Cheers, WTPOV!
Post a Comment